DE-CANALIZE OUR RIVER
Zulfikar Jr against the Ecological Catastrophe in Indus basin
Pakistan’s government has unveiled an ambitious plan to dig six canals from the Indus River, aiming to irrigate four million acres of land in the Cholistan desert for "Cooperative farming"
The project is being touted as a solution to food insecurity and rural poverty and environmental experts and activists are raising alarms about its potential to trigger an ecological and humanitarian disaster.
The most vocal critic of this mega project is Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Junior, grandson of former Prime Minister Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, who warns that the plan could devastate the Indus River ecosystem, displace communities, and push Sindh to the brink of Ecological catastrophe and starvation.
Zulfikar Junior rallies against the worst capitalist thrust against the lifeline of the bioregion, the Indus River.
“Transforming desert into fertile farmlands”
This slogan may most probably be a historical blunder.
The government’s proposal involves diverting water from the Indus and Sutlej rivers to the Cholistan desert. The initiative, branded as “cooperative farming,” is framed as a way to boost agricultural productivity, create jobs, and alleviate poverty. However, critics argue that the term “cooperative” is misleading. Instead of empowering small farmers, the project appears to favor large-scale land leases to wealthy individuals and corporations.
This isn’t about small farmers coming together to work the land, It’s about leasing vast tracts of land to powerful businessmen. I recently met someone who leased 5,000 acres from the military for his so-called cooperative farm. This isn’t cooperation; it’s consolidation of land and resources in the hands of a privileged few.
The Water Crisis
The country is one of the most water-stressed in the world, with per capita water availability plummeting to alarming levels. The Indus River, Pakistan’s primary water source, is under immense strain due to over-extraction, climate change, and mismanagement. Diverting additional water for the canal project could exacerbate this crisis.
The Sutlej River has virtually no water left, So where is this water coming from? It’s being pumped from the Taunsa Barrage and diverted to the Cholistan desert. But there’s not enough water past the Sukkur Barrage to sustain this kind of project. The Indus is already struggling to meet existing demands. Adding more strain will only push it closer to collapse.
Ecological Fallout
The environmental consequences of the project could be catastrophic. The Indus River is not just a water source; it is a lifeline for millions of people and a habitat for unique ecosystems. One of the most vulnerable species is the Indus River dolphin, already endangered due to habitat loss and pollution. Diverting water from the river could further shrink their habitat, pushing them closer to extinction.
Moreover, the Cholistan desert, though arid, supports a delicate balance of flora and fauna, as well as indigenous communities that rely on the land for their livelihoods. Irrigating millions of acres in this region could lead to soil degradation, loss of biodiversity, and the displacement of local populations.
A Humanitarian Crisis in Making
The project’s impact on human communities could be equally devastating. Sindh, a province heavily dependent on the Indus River, is already facing severe water shortages. Farmers in the region are struggling to irrigate their crops, and many communities are on the brink of starvation. Diverting more water from the Indus could exacerbate these challenges, leaving millions without access to clean water or food.
Critics of the canal project argue that Pakistan should focus on sustainable water management practices rather than grandiose schemes that risk further depleting its already strained resources. Solutions such as improving irrigation efficiency, investing in rainwater harvesting, and promoting drought-resistant crops could help address water scarcity without jeopardizing the environment or communities.
This project will dry our river, kill our Bulhans (blind dolphins) and bring the people of Sindh to the point of starvation. We’re not just talking about an environmental disaster, we’re talking about a humanitarian crisis. The government needs to understand that the true cost of this project is far too high. We’re already one of the countries most vulnerable to climate change. Instead of pursuing projects that will only make things worse, we need to invest in sustainable practices that protect our resources and empower our people. The future of our country depends on it.
Is there any road ahead?
If the government moves forward with its plans, the debate over the canal project is likely to intensify. Environmentalists, activists, and local communities are calling for a thorough assessment of the project’s potential impacts and greater transparency in its implementation. The stakes are high, and the decisions made today will have far-reaching consequences for Pakistan’s environment, economy, and people.
For now, the warnings from voices like Bhutto’s serve as a stark reminder of the delicate balance between development and sustainability. In a country already grappling with the effects of climate change and water scarcity, the cost of getting this balance wrong could be catastrophic.
Pakistan stands at a Existential crossroads and the choices the regime makes today will shape the future for generations to come.
Will they prioritize short-term gains over long-term sustainability? (As they did historically) Or will it heed the warnings of those who argue that the true cost of these projects is far too high?
Our struggle is all about rescuing the Indus River, its biodiversity and the millions of humans who depend on it, from the few regional benefieries of global neoliberal capitalism.
Help us spreading our words
